Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 6470 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 96% |
Arguments: | 6299 |
Debates: | 315 |
As a reasonable person I can speak objectively about people that have argued towards me using their emotions. They often cloud things and get in the way. There's no reason to even have emotions. You can be moral without them if you try to think logically you can see the fault in stealing and killing.
So they are basically like agnostic agnostics.
Wow, I understand being undecided that's why I flocked to agnosticism, but to be undecided about being undecided is just a step too far.
It's not long before their is the religious view that claims ignostics claim too much, then the view that claims that they think too much. When will it end?
meat is in no way murder. Are animals murderers? Is killing something you wish to eat unlawful?
If eating meat is amoral why is eating a plant any better?
|