As a reasonable person I can speak objectively about people that have argued towards me using their emotions. They often cloud things and get in the way. There's no reason to even have emotions. You can be moral without them if you try to think logically you can see the fault in stealing and killing.

So they are basically like agnostic agnostics.

Wow, I understand being undecided that's why I flocked to agnosticism, but to be undecided about being undecided is just a step too far.

It's not long before their is the religious view that claims ignostics claim too much, then the view that claims that they think too much. When will it end?

meat is in no way murder. Are animals murderers? Is killing something you wish to eat unlawful?

If eating meat is amoral why is eating a plant any better?