Return to CreateDebate.comphilosophy • Join this debate community

Philosophy


ThePyg's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of ThePyg's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

All abortions aren't legal. consider late term abortions. They are only legal in certain states.

People are constantly put on suicide watch. Just eliminate this and we won't have a problem.

And saying that having the death penalty will result in us eventually just killing innocent people all the time is like saying that having marijuana legalized will eventually lead to us legalizing Crack and Meth.

Fact is, if you can prove that someone is a murderer or child rapist, they should be executed. I'm not saying execute based on ONLY the decision of the jury. I'm saying proven beyond a reasonable doubt (which is how cases are trialed anyway).

When you're killing off all of the worst people, that's it. No one else is next in line. Might as well say "If you're curing all diseases, what will be next? Taking away the ability to think?"

2 points

Ways to slow down the possibilities:

Legalize all abortion

Legalize Suicide

Legalize Euthanasia in all circumstances (if you don't have money to keep a brain dead person alive, pull the plug).

Use the death penalty more often (child rape, no insanity pleas, etc.)

1 point

random down vote from someone who can't prove me wrong... how sad.

0 points

it's not like we don't care, but really. What point can you find? Animals are irrational, imbecile creatures that only know 4 things:

Mate Feed Kill Repeat. The simplicity of their life style invokes that death does not matter.

1 point

boxers or briefs.

Seriously, this can easily be argued as one of the most important issues of ALL TIME.

2 points

Predators are not behaving immorally because they lack the intellectual capacity for morals.

With that argument, is it that immoral to kill a creature that doesn't have the intellectual capacity to understand anything other than Mate Feed Kill Repeat?

1 point

It seems that every religion in the fuckin' world has to somehow defy science...

Buddhism vs. Science.

2 points

I think Donnie Darko can rap this up a bit. It's pointless to care about the death of an animal.

Yes, when torture of an animal occurs it's wrong because it's prolonged pain of a living creature. But just to kill it (for food, vanity or sport) is part of what makes us human. We dominate.

2 points

No, Catholicism where I am isn't that big. It's mainly the Protestants and other stuff. They all volunteer at the church or sing in the choir and shit like that. And they love having a "relationship" with Jesus. They are also generally happy. It isn't the cheery stuff you probably see in small towns, it's more of just people who look they found something that really makes them happy.

1 point

on the answer of a deity, they are actually more agnostic. They just believe that "it is what it is". They believe in Karma and Darma, though, which I don't believe in (since it insights that we're being watched or something).

As for the other religions... most people who are very religious (that i meet at least) are very happy... you should probably stop hanging out with such depressed people.

1 point

i'm surrounded by both atheists and Christians dude... and a lot of Jews.

All of them disagree with Agnosticism. Sorry you can't figure it out...

1 point

the whole comparison between God and Santa Claus is really upsetting... I thought we went beyond that.

God can be anything. From an intelligent designer to an unnatural, yet natural bundle of energy in the middle of the Universe. I consider these possibilities mainly because Random chance is not acceptable. But, to believe in random chance is to disbelieve in God. I believe neither, for we are merely at stage one of understanding the Universe.

I should have said "atheists don't need to prove that God doesn't exist". Once again, this is a far greater force than just Santa Claus or the tooth fairy. This is something that, when you ignore what religion has says, actually has some leg.

Agnosticism is surpassing that childish debate on whether one should believe in God or not and is just considering the possibilities. Atheists don't consider intelligent design. Atheists say "of course you can't prove that God doesn't exist, but the idea is just silly". They dismiss it completely. Agnostics, on the other hand say "Well, considering that the Big Bang had to occur in perfect conditions or else the Universe would never have formed it's not irrational to say that something might have guided it". That is the difference.

Once again, I can not give an answer on whether i believe that a "God" exists. I am not smart enough... sorry.


1 of 2 Pages: Next >>

Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]