Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
ChuckHades
| Reward Points: | 3197 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 94% |
| Arguments: | 2771 |
| Debates: | 88 |
Got a reason why?
Because I don't think any concept of God is correct, any concept that invokes the supernatural cannot be empirically proven, and thus doesn't interest me. Unless the true concept of God is natural, which defeats the point of being God, all the different concepts can be disregarded simultaneously.
I see you took some inspiration from me here ;)
While it's not a position I take, it's certainly one that, if more famous, would have a large amount of followers. There are thousands of gods in history, and an infinite number of combinations. So when we say "God", how do we know we are correct in our usage?
|
||||||||||||||||||||
